This is longish .....and well worth it. On December 11. 2003, OPB broadcast The Alternative Radio piece for the week which turned out to be this talk by Bill Moyers given on June 4, 2003 in Washington, DC.  The part below, sent by Jer, is only the last third of the complete talk, and it has been reworked somewhat.  See the version of this segment as spoken in Washington (and how to get the whole talk) HERE.  

 By Bill Moyers 

As a citizen I don't like the consequences of this crusade, but you have to respect the conservatives for their successful strategy in gaining control of the national agenda.  Their stated and open aim is to change how America is governed -- to strip from government all its functions except those that reward their rich and privileged benefactors. They are quite candid about it, even acknowledging their mean spirit in accomplishing it.  Their leading strategist in Washington - the same Grover Norquist [] has famously said he wants to shrink the government down to the size that it could be drowned in a bathtub.  More recently, in commenting on the fiscal crisis in the states and its affect on schools and poor people, Norquist said, "I hope one of them" one of the states "goes bankrupt." So much for compassionate conservatism.  But at least Norquist says what he means and means what he says.  The White House pursues the same homicidal dream without saying so.  Instead of shrinking down the government, they're filling the bathtub with so much debt that it floods the house, water-logs the economy, and washes away services for decades that have lifted millions of Americans out of destitution and into the middle-class.  And what happens once the public's property has been flooded? Privatize it.  Sell it at a discounted rate to the corporations. 

It is the most radical assault on the notion of one nation, indivisible, that has occurred in our lifetime.  I'll be frank with you: I simply don't understand it or the malice in which it is steeped.  Many people are nostalgic for a golden age.  These people seem to long for the Gilded Age.  That I can grasp.  They measure America only by their place on the material spectrum and they bask in the company of the new corporate aristocracy, as privileged a class as we have seen since the plantation owners of antebellum America and the court of Louis IV [XIV?].  What I can't explain is the rage of the counter-revolutionaries to dismantle every last brick of the social contract.  At this advanced age I simply have to accept the fact that the tension between haves and have-nots is built into human psychology and society itself[;] it's ever with us.  However, I'm just as puzzled as to why, with right wing wrecking crews blasting away at social benefits once considered invulnerable, Democrats are fearful of being branded "class warriors" in a war the other side started and is determined to win.  I don't get why conceding your opponent's premises and fighting on his turf isn't the sure-fire prescription for irrelevance and ultimately obsolescence.  But I confess as well that I don't know how to resolve the social issues that have driven wedges into your ranks.  And I don't know how to reconfigure democratic politics to fit into an age of soundbites and polling dominated by a media oligarchy whose corporate journalists are neutered and whose right-wing publicists have no shame.

War Is Peace
Freedom Is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Is a mass media designed by the advertising industry.
It works!
They have learned how to fool almost everyone almost all of the time
Conservatism is Compasionate
People differ on
What is it?
What should it be?
There are compelling reasons, based simply on elementary logic,
that one of these viewpoints
is simply wrong.
by being
perilous oversimplification.
What I do know is this: While the social dislocations and meanness that galvanized progressives in the 19th century are resurgent so is the vision of justice, fairness, and equality.  That's a powerful combination if only there are people around to fight for it.  The battle to renew democracy has enormous resources to call upon - and great precedents for inspiration.  Consider the experience of James Bryce, who published "The Great Commonwealth" back in 1895 at the height of the First Gilded Age.  Americans, Bryce said, "were hopeful and philanthropic." He saw first-hand the ills of that "dark and unlovely age," but he went on to say: "A hundred times I have been disheartened by the facts I was stating: a hundred times has the recollection of the abounding strength and vitality of the nation chased away those tremors."
What will it take to get back in the fight? Understanding the real interests and deep opinions of the American people is the first thing. 

And what are those? That a Social Security card is not a private portfolio statement but a membership ticket in a society where we all contribute to a common treasury so that none need face the indignities of poverty in old age without that help.  That tax evasion is not a form of conserving investment capital but a brazen abandonment of responsibility to the country.  That income inequality is not a sign of freedom-of-opportunity at work, because if it persists and grows, then unless you believe that some people are naturally born to ride and some to wear saddles, it's a sign that opportunity is less than equal. That self-interest is a great motivator for production and progress, but is amoral unless contained within the framework of community.  That the rich have the right to buy more cars than anyone else, more homes, vacations, gadgets and gizmos, but they do not have the right to buy more democracy than anyone else.  That public services, when privatized, serve only those who can afford them and weaken the sense that we all rise and fall together as "one nation, indivisible." That concentration in the production of goods may sometimes be useful and efficient, but monopoly over the dissemination of ideas is evil.  That prosperity requires good wages and benefits for workers.  And that our nation can no more survive as half democracy and half oligarchy than it could survive "half slave and half free" and that keeping it from becoming all oligarchy is steady work, our work. 

Ideas have power as long as they are not frozen in doctrine.  But ideas need legs.  The eight-hour day, the minimum wage, the conservation of natural resources and the protection of our air, water, and land, women's rights and civil rights, free trade unions, Social Security and a civil service based on merit all these were launched as citizen's movements and won the endorsement of the political class only after long struggles and in the face of bitter opposition and sneering attacks.

The dream of automation providing all of human needs today benefits mostly the few who own the automata.  The public sector has been purloined by a small number of tollgate inventors driven by a hypergreed that is is blind to the needs of others.

Those five steps that lead to seeing science better also lead to seeing society better.  The fifth step is the most difficult--and here the most important.

It's just a fact: Democracy doesn't work without citizen activism and participation, starting at the community.  Trickle down politics doesn't work much better than trickle down economics.  It's also a fact that civilization happens because we don't leave things to other people. What's right and good doesn't come naturally.  You have to stand up and fight for it as if the cause depends on you, because it does.  Allow yourself that conceit - to believe that the flame of democracy will never go out as long as there's one candle in your hand. 

So go for it.  Never mind the odds.  Remember what the progressives faced.  Karl Rove isn't tougher than Mark Hanna was in his time and a hundred years from now some historian will be wondering how it was that Norquist and Company got away with it as long as they did how they waged war almost unopposed on the infrastructure of social justice, on the arrangements that make life fair, on the mutual rights and responsibilities that offer opportunity, civil liberties, and a decent standard of living to the least among us. 

"Democracy is not a lie" I first learned that from Henry Demarest Lloyd, the progressive journalist whose book, "Wealth against Commonwealth," laid open the Standard trust a century ago.  Lloyd came to the conclusion to "Regenerate the individual is a half truth.  The reorganization of the society which he makes and which makes him is the other part.  The love of liberty became liberty in America by clothing itself in the complicated group of strengths known as the government of the United States." And it was then he said: "Democracy is not a lie.  There live in the body of the commonality unexhausted virtue and the ever-refreshed strength which can rise equal to any problems of progress.  In the hope of tapping some reserve of their power of self-help," he said, "this story is told to the people." 

This is your story the progressive story of America. 

Moyers for president!!!!!!!!!! 
Patriotism The dangers of oversimplifications not recognized as such by the majority are among the most threatening dangers a democracy can face.  The erosion of our society by these threats has already gone so far it may not be reparable.    But we must try.